Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1973 14
Original file (NR1973 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S$, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE £001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

TAL
Docket No: 1973-14
19 March 2015

Dear Same

This is in reference to your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552. The application was filed ina timely

‘Manner.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. ,
application on 11 March 2015. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your.allegations of
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and

applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient

to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. .

You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 23 January 2008. You served
for two years and one month without disciplinary incident, but on
18 February 2011, you received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for
drunken or reckless operation of a vehicle. On 22 May 2012, you
were honorably discharged from active duty at comptetton of
required service and assigned an RE-3C reenlistment code.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,

carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to change your reenlistment code. Nevertheless, the
Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a
change in the reenlistment code. Furthermore, the RE-3C code may
not prohibit reenlistment, but requires a waiver be obtained from
recruiting personnel who are responsible for determining whether
you meet the requirements for reenlistment. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

A

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4510 14

    Original file (NR4510 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is released from active duty and not recommended for reenlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2134 14

    Original file (NR2134 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 30 March 2009, you were counselled and advised that because of your NJP you would be assigned an RE-3C reenlistment code. Consequently, when-applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4929 14

    Original file (NR4929 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is released from active duty, and is not recommended for reenlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5029 14

    Original file (NR5029 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1122 14

    Original file (NR1122 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2015. in this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reentry code based on your circumstances. The RE-3C reentry code may not prohibit reenlistment, but requires.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6347 14

    Original file (NR6347 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7372 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR7372 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-3C reentry code is authorized when a Marine is released from active duty at the completion of their required service as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5886 14

    Original file (NR5886 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2138 14

    Original file (NR2138 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 ‘March 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 9 November 2013, you were honorably discharged from active duty at completion of required service and assigned an RE-3C reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6324 14

    Original file (NR6324 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the most appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances.